Subject:
|
Re: More parts feedback
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:06:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1083 times
|
| |
|
|
"John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> writes:
> The problem I see with this name is that the tread pieces are in no way
> similar to the current Technic Link.
This is a good point, yes. I did not consider this.
I originally thought it would be a good idea to use "Technic Link" as
the first two words in the description, to make them sort next to each
other, then add "Chain" and "Tread" respectively to identify them.
Now, you've made me realize that the current part "2637.DAT Technic Link
16L" clutters this concept. Putting these three parts in the same
category should indeed be avoided. Thanks for making me aware of this.
> I think Technic Tread should be the first two words the description,
> then add whatever will best identify the two parts.
You mean something like
Technic Tread Chain Link
Technic Tread 0.6 x 2.6
I don't think I like this too much.
I think perhaps that "Technic Chain" would be better? Perhaps
Technic Chain Link
Technic Chain Tread 0.6 x 2.6
But I'm not a native English speaker, so I may be wrongly biased.
> Alternatively, the Technic Link could be renamed, as that name is not
> very descriptive of the part.
Perhaps, yes. There is a part called "2739.DAT Technic Steering Link"
which looks much like the "2637.DAT Technic Link 16L". Perhaps these
two should be put in the same category somehow?
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) I disagree completely! The Links and the Tread Links are virtually the same, except that the tread has an additional component. They are completely compatible, and are often used (by me, anyway) in concert to achieve various design goals. I (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) The problem I see with this name is that the tread pieces are in no way similar to the current Technic Link. I think Technic Tread should be the first two words the description, then add whatever will best identify the two parts. (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
