Subject:
|
Re: More parts feedback
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:28:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
789 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> So how about this: "Technic Link Tread 0.6 x 2.6"?
> ^^^^^
> What do you guys think?
The problem I see with this name is that the tread pieces are in no way
similar to the current Technic Link. I think Technic Tread should be the
first two words the description, then add whatever will best identify the
two parts.
Alternatively, the Technic Link could be renamed, as that name is not very
descriptive of the part.
-John Van
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) This is a good point, yes. I did not consider this. I originally thought it would be a good idea to use "Technic Link" as the first two words in the description, to make them sort next to each other, then add "Chain" and "Tread" respectively (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) I agree with you if you add the word "Tread" in front of the dimensions. That way, it is more clear that the dimensions refer to the tread plate and not the overall size of the link. So how about this: "Technic Link Tread 0.6 x 2.6"? ^^^^^ (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
