Subject:
|
Re: More parts feedback
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:26:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
929 times
|
| |
|
|
Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> writes:
> I disagree completely! The Links and the Tread Links are virtually
> the same, except that the tread has an additional component. They
> are completely compatible, and are often used (by me, anyway) in
> concert to achieve various design goals. I would certainly group
> them together and I like the naming scheme as originally proposed.
I don't think you understood what part we were talking about. These are
the three parts we do _not_ want to group together:
2637.DAT Technic Link 16L
3711.DAT Technic Link Chain
3873.DAT Technic Link Tread
Don't worry, I originally thought the same as you, which didn't make
sense to me, since John VanZwieten normally has very good points. Upon
careful examination, I understood that he refered to 2637.DAT, and this
point should not be missed.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) 2637 should be renamed to something like 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Links 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with Holes 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Connectors Steve (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) I disagree completely! The Links and the Tread Links are virtually the same, except that the tread has an additional component. They are completely compatible, and are often used (by me, anyway) in concert to achieve various design goals. I (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
