Subject:
|
Re: More parts feedback
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 15:16:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
764 times
|
| |
|
|
"Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn" <nzlijn@euronet.nl> writes:
> I believe that the numbers should reflect the dimensions of the plate.
> That is 12 LDU x 52 LDU so make it 0.6 x 2.6 instead of 1 x 2.5
I agree with you if you add the word "Tread" in front of the dimensions.
That way, it is more clear that the dimensions refer to the tread plate
and not the overall size of the link.
So how about this: "Technic Link Tread 0.6 x 2.6"?
^^^^^
What do you guys think?
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) The problem I see with this name is that the tread pieces are in no way similar to the current Technic Link. I think Technic Tread should be the first two words the description, then add whatever will best identify the two parts. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) Fredrik Glöckner answered: .... (...) .... (...) I believe that the numbers should reflect the dimensions of the plate. That is 12 LDU x 52 LDU so make it 0.6 x 2.6 instead of 1 x 2.5 Greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
