Subject:
|
Re: More parts feedback
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 22:08:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
980 times
|
| |
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner wrote:
> blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:26:05 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner
> > <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think you understood what part we were talking about. These are
> > > the three parts we do _not_ want to group together:
Ah, I understand :)
> > 2637 should be renamed to something like
> >
> > 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Links
> > 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with Holes
> > 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Connectors
In this case, it seems that a use-specific name such as: "Technic Tie Rod" might
be appropriate, since even if one doesn't use this part as a steering linkage,
the "specific" term "tie-rod" is actually generic enough to cover just about
every use (even in the Y-wing, if you stretch it a bit). Tie-Rod certainly make
a lot more sense to me than "Axle with [something]" since, while it does have an
axle-like cross section, there is no way to use it in any manner that is similar
to an axle.
--Karim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) This sounds like a very good idea. It will also make it easier to include the Technic Linkage part which comes with the Y-wing. (8 of them in every Y-wing, don't know just how long they are.) Here's one more suggestion as to the title: (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
