 | | Re: Category Statement
|
|
(...) By all means! I was secretly hoping that my questions would lead to such a type of action. Feel free to rearange them into a clear set of instructions. You've earned my gratitude again, M. Moolhuysen. (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) Isn't "Musket Pistol" an oxymoron? Why not just name them Minifig Flintlock Pistol Minifig Flintlock Musket Minifig Revolver eric (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) I'm fairly happy with keeping the names short, and introducing longer names when (if) it becomes necessary. Minifig Revolver is (currently) clear Minifig Rifle is clear Minifig Musket is not clear So Minifig Musket Longarm (or whatever other (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partial list of parts for 2000-02 Update
|
|
(...) No need. Now that I've gotten LDAO installed correctly (KNOCK ON WOOD), I can take care of the musket myself. It'll take a day or so, I'm foguring. Thanks, though. BTW: IIRC, you asked that I re-orient the musket so that the *barrel* is the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Category Statement
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote: Moving this one to the top: (...) CATEGORY provides a method to place all parts in a comprehensive classification system. KEYWORDS provides a method to associate potential search-terms with a part. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partial list of parts for 2000-02 Update
|
|
(...) Sorry about the employment thing. I know what its like to be fired. If you want, I can reorient the longarm musket part. I'll do it the same way you would - with LDAO. Steve (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) *either* the "Pirate Musket Pistol" *or* the "Wild West Pistol Revolver"... You *don't* know for *certain* just by looking at that name... (Continued below.) (...) By using "modern" and "archaic", there would be *no* ambiguity: an *archaic* (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
How about just minifig gun musket minifig gun pistol minifig gun revolver and minifig gun rifle (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
OK, I've done DAT files for three of the four firearms that LegoCo produces for Lego minifigs (the pirate pistol, the pirate musket, and the wild west revolver), and I still have questions on how we should name these weapons. Both the wild west guns (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partial list of parts for 2000-02 Update
|
|
(...) Yeah, about that... I had LDAO loaded on my PC at the office. I just recently got internet access at home. Having been fired recently -- and thus no more access to my work PC with all the other programs loaded -- I've been uploading programs, (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partial list of parts for 2000-02 Update
|
|
(...) Fair enough. I did only completely change the name. BTW, the word "Accessory" shouldn't be there. It should just be X59.DAT Minifig Sword Large (...) Not exactly, but that's a part of the big picture. Basically, the theme-based categories (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [somewhat of Topic] Connecting an Arm to a Gear [DAT]
|
|
Since none replyed, maybe you didn't get the ideia ! So, here is my best setup so far, does anyone have any other usefull setup. 0 Untitled 0 Name: Arm.dat 1 0 0 -46 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 32073.DAT 1 7 0 -46 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3648.DAT 1 0 0 -36 (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Category Statement
|
|
(...) In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: (...) I would like to add those headers to my part files. I remember I've asked this before, I did get an answer back then, but it wasn't very clear to me. I discontinued the thread, because I didn't have (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Category Statement
|
|
I thought about a new feature in MLCad where the user can define his own groups to be show in the part preview and in the part tree. Each group will have a certain rule (search criteria) which assigns parts to this groups. The part assignment is (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partial list of parts for 2000-02 Update
|
|
(...) I have a beef with this. The NAME I gave this was "Castle Greatsword" (not "Minifig Accessory Sword Large"). Now, if I understand correctly, you want to eventually migrate all minifig accessories *away* from the "Castle" (and "Pirate") (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Parts Category: Cockpit
|
|
(...) Does anyone else see things the same way as Jonathan does? It's not what I had been thinking, but Cockpit could be defined to include both the base parts and the canopy parts. The only thing is this: Windscreen is a fairly cleanly- defined (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Parts Category: Cockpit
|
|
Talking about the subject summarized at: (...) I think canopy pieces should probably stay in the Windscreen group. I can see putting the Space Nose and Space Cabin Base pieces in a Cockpit group. There's not really any other place to stick them, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Category Statement
|
|
(...) I'd say there are no plans to add statements for all part files. The 'default value' for category is the first word in the partname. Since, 3001.dat doesn't have a 0 CATEGORY statement, its category comes from the part name, and the category (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Speaking of colors...
|
|
(...) Silver looks more like brushed aluminum. (...) I think so -- it appears that the new silver is actually the color of the plastic, not a post-molding layer that's plated onto the parts. (...) suggestions being trans-black, 32, or trans-dark (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Category Statement
|
|
I thought about making use of the category statement in MLCad. This would have allowed to group the parts by category rather than by name or something else .... ... but I did a quick check on the parts and found out that only arround 5% of the parts (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
