Subject:
|
Re: New Parts Category: Cockpit
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:52:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> basicly I see the cockpit catogory as a place for those parts that are
> used as cockpits/canopies/etc (because I dont think that they are really
> windscreens, a jet fighter glass thing is accually called a canopy for
> example...)
Does anyone else see things the same way as Jonathan does? It's not what I
had been thinking, but Cockpit could be defined to include both the base parts
and the canopy parts. The only thing is this: Windscreen is a fairly cleanly-
defined group. It might seem a bit odd to call a canopy part a windscreen,
but then who's to say that those pieces can't be used on cars? If it's not
broken, why fix it?
And there are only 29 pieces in Windscreen, so it's not like it's crying to be
broken up.
So I'm not in favor of moving canopies to Cockpit, but I wouldn't be totally
opposed. If other people are strong supporters, I might be swayed.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Parts Category: Cockpit
|
| parts which I think should go into cockpit: 30299 6058 2337 2483 2620 30372 30384 4474 6084 6085 2507 and mabie 30037 551 2418 2443 2598 basicly I see the cockpit catogory as a place for those parts that are used as cockpits/canopies/etc (because I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
