Subject:
|
Category Statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:04:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
577 times
|
| |
|
|
I thought about making use of the category statement in MLCad. This would
have allowed to group the parts by category rather than by name or something
else ....
... but I did a quick check on the parts and found out that only arround 5%
of the parts do have this statement included ....
therefor I think it doesn't make sence to implement such a strategy into
MLCad, or how do you think about it?
Are there any planes to add category statements to all the parts of the
library?
Michael
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Category Statement
|
| (...) I'd say there are no plans to add statements for all part files. The 'default value' for category is the first word in the partname. Since, 3001.dat doesn't have a 0 CATEGORY statement, its category comes from the part name, and the category (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
