Subject:
|
Re: DOS Makelist (was Re: Uber-install (was Re: Organizing the Site Revamp))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 18:56:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@+SayNoToSpam+geocities.com
|
Viewed:
|
2341 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> Umm, that would be really great if you did that. We never came up with
> a replacement for James' original makelist.exe (which can only handle
> 1000 parts).
Why the limitation on 1000 parts? Have all the makelist implementations
shelled out to call sort.exe? I'm sure there's a quicksort call in the ANSI
C libraries, and stl has some great capabilities for those of the C++
persuasion...
> How big would a distributable of your Perl-makelist be? And how easy
> would it be for non-techies to run?
Well, it would fit within 1/44 Mb uncompressed. The problem with Perl is
that it behaves better if it's been installed properly; i.e. just
havingperl.exe in the same dir wouldn't be the best solution. Requiring a
minimal install of perl wouldn't be too hot, either, especially if they
already have it installed. Urrrr... I think there's gotta be a way to tell
if perl's already installed. I could probably scan PATH and check for it
there... I shall ponder upon it some more.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
_
| | I'm sorry Dave, but Abort, Retry or Fail?
|o| Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
|_| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
