 | | Re: mirroring parts
|
|
(...) One way to do this with the tools you have at hand would be to put the portion you want to mirror in a subpart, mirror the reference to this manually, and then inline the subpart again to retrieve it mirrored. Fredrik (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts from 8448 not LDrawn
|
|
(...) Is this the same as the one in the 8880? If so then I have a mock-up of it if anyone wants it. It uses a technic engine piston to simulate the towball socket and liftarms for the sides. (...) Thanks for the info (...) -- Jonathan Wilson (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts from 8448 not LDrawn
|
|
Urgh. Just hit some key which seemed to reset the body of this reply to the default text. Blech. In lugnet.cad.dev, Jonathan Wilson writes: [before that, Steve wrote:] (...) It's a piece which fits between the driving ring and the freespinning 16(?) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: mirroring parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Boy, am I tired! Of course I mean: 2 24 100 24 12 200 24 12 2 24 -100 24 12 -200 24 12 (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: mirroring parts [DAT]
|
|
Sure, if I understand your question correctly, that was one of the main reasons I started developing LDS. Have a look at this:. (URL) mirror x 2 24 100 24 12 200 24 12 mirror off gives: 2 24 10 24 12 20 24 12 2 24 -10 24 12 -20 24 12 and so on. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts from 8448 not LDrawn
|
|
(...) Which piece is this? (...) Is this similar to the other gear rack with holes pieces? (...) Is this the shock that has been "on hold" for about 6 months? (...) I take it this is the one that keeps breaking (...) What are these? Some missing (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | mirroring parts
|
|
Has anyone got a tool, that can mirror a portion of a part? What I need to do is change the prefix (from positive (nothing) to negative (-)) of a whole bunch of "X" values, leaving the "Y" and "Z" values intact I don't feel like doing it by hand:) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDS] Is the keyword PLOT free?
|
|
(...) Details, details. Do you expect me to remember everything...? ;o) (URL) interact correctly with LDS Shell, I had to make some small adjustments in LDS. Ver 0.22 is not an official version, but at least it has the PLOT function, though (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDS] Is the keyword PLOT free?
|
|
(...) So where does one get a copy of this extremely useful LDS Shell? Don (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
I'm not quite sure where I left off in this discussion, so I suppose this is as good a place as any for an update. I just hooked up ldglite to Netscape in linux by adding the MIME type "application/x-ldraw" and setting the app to (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: x786a.dat - electric motor with axle mockup
|
|
(...) Actually 786 was one of my allocation of _unknown part numbers_, but no matter. If it gets released as x786, I'll strike it from my list. Chris (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts from 8448 not LDrawn
|
|
[X-posted to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.technic, follow-up set to lugnet.cad.dev] While building the way-cool #8448 SSS Super Car Mk II, I compiled a list of parts which have not been modeled in LDraw yet. I've included it below. I had two reactions to (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDS] Is the keyword PLOT free?
|
|
(...) Good. Then I hereby claim it. (...) I wasn't either, but then came LDS Shell, and I changed my mind. After the Redraw button is clicked on, the Editor re-reads the source file. (...) Correct, is there a better terminolgy? If those two (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDS] Is the keyword PLOT free?
|
|
I believe PLOT is currently unused by all known LDRAW utilities. I'm not too keen on the compiler modifying the source file, but that's your decision. So <sectors> is how many points to generate, and <total_sectors> is the total number of sectors in (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) At this point, I don't even know if the ARC program is DOS or Windows, so I can't say for sure if it's case-aware or not. I'll be finding out soon, after the 2000-01 voting process. Which is going to happen (relatively) soon, I promise. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [LDS] Is the keyword PLOT free?
|
|
A new version of LDS is just about ready to be uploaded. I have added a new function that has no real name yet, but I think PLOT is a candidate. What it does is hard to explain, but I'll try: It plots the coordinates of a curve and creates an array (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) I agree. However, AFAIK, whenever LEdit creates a file, it creates it as all uppercase. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for crystal in Rock Raider sets?
|
|
(...) Because TLG uses a different process to make the chrome piece and the transparent piece and we are using TLG's numbers. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
|
|
(...) BZZT Wrong Answer. Don't forget model team, some train sets and there is even a castle set with alternate model instructions -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
Don Heyse: (...) Sorry, I had forgotten that. (...) I am sure we can get the Jessimans to accept a repackaging of that kind (if we agree on it). (...) A very sensible strategy. (...) We would have to have it approved by the Jessimans. (...) I can't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
