 | | Parts and Pattern
|
|
Hallo ! Am 01.09.99 schrieb John VanZwieten: (...) That's an argument! JV> But LDraw novices won't be able to offset something by 0.1 LDU. I JV> was using LEdit at least 6 months before I learned you could hit JV> "x" and any number to offset on the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
(...) And you won't be able to see it reliably. LDraw requires a positional difference of at least 2LDU to prevent co-incident surface bleedthrough. (...) That's an entirely different issue. Using line commands to draw lines on a sticker is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:57F1FE754246D21...@aarhus... (...) But LDraw novices won't be able to offset something by 0.1 LDU. I was using LEdit at least 6 months before I learned you could hit "x" and any number to (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Status report
|
|
Congratulations!.. I hope all the remaining goes like that. Regards, Selçuk Tore Eriksson wrote in message <37CC48AB.B9FECDBD@m...net.se>... (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Parts and Pattern
|
|
(...) I think 2D is enough: when you apply the sticker, just offset it by e.g. 0.1 LDU (or even less) and it won't float noticeable. And stickers should be modeled using linetype 3 and 4 only. /Lars (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Status report
|
|
Hi Lego-lovers! I have some very good news. In less then a week, I have won two very important "battles" in the fight for custody. I now see no possibility for my ex-wife to level up the score. The only trouble is I've made her lawyer really pissed (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
(...) Was it? I couldn't remember. I've got an archive of most of the 'sticker discussion', but it's not on this machine. I'm sure I was a proponent of thick stickers. I reversed my position because LDraw objects are just shells, not solid 3D. But (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37cbd256.575508...net.com... (...) I thought the consensus was to do the stickers in 3D, maybe 2LDU thick. This would at least give a sticker a shot of being recognizable in LDraw, and (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
(...) Yes. Sticker-files should be just the stickers, not stickers-stuck-on-parts. The numbers for the sticker files should use the ID number printed on the sticker sheet, but I don't remember if the long (7 digit?) or short (5 digit) number is (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
Yes, I have drawn up the pattern for the black/white bird thing, potentially for the shield and torso. Struggling to find time to do the LDraw work though (due to the recent purchase of a large lot of unsorted parts). I'll register it on the Parts (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Parts and Pattern
|
|
Hallo ! Am 28.08.99 schrieb Steve Bliss: SB> There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD SB> ... SB> the target piece, as shown in the set instructions. Nice. And had there been some result of the discussion? SB> I would *love* (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
|
[cross-posted and follow-up set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Hi! (...) There was extensive discussion about this issue, before the L-CAD mailing list moved to lugnet.cad.dev. The general thought was that stickers should be separate 'part files'. There (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | I am toning down my involvement in this group
|
|
I am toning down my involvement in this group I may still make models and post them but i will give uo trying to make parts. I will probobly also not do too much about submitting my models to the OMR. If anyone is interested in doing so then I will (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) i agree.. if i see it happen again, i'll try to detail the processes that led me up to seeing the error occur J (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) Hmm. That sounds like it's situational, not data-dependent. IOW, something you did earlier caused a condition where the inliner messed up. Yuck. (...) Yes, the Inliner (the one separate from the editors) does a standard LDraw-search for a (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) wouldn't you know it.. now i can't recreate the error.. not sure what circumstances cause it.. but it *has* happened... here's something odd that's going on with the inliner though.. i open a file (298.dat) from the models directory (i copied (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) will do, i'll mail you something tonight.. i never would have figured this one out, but i saw it when i was doing all the technic wheels a couple of months ago, and on a small update i just sent terry.. i thought it was me, trashing things (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) Could you send me a file that has this problem? I've never run across it. Heard about it plenty of times, but never experienced it personally. (...) Don't worry. I added a checkbox next to the radio button, so now the checkbox blocks out the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) steve, did you address the issue with the inliner converting type 5 lines to type 4?? (i came across this problem again recently (in 2.0.4) and just wondered if it was on your "to fix" list for the next release) also.. this is a minor nitpick, (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: trying to guess the stud spacing by measuring bricks
|
|
(...) [Some snippage may occur during shipment] Maybe TLG deliberately used an odd spacing, to make it harder to make compatible bricks? Steve (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
