 | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) It may be worth mentioning the winding order for line types 3 and 4. (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
Go Stefan Go! (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(...) I noticed they were offset somewhat because of pivot point issues, and that took some time to resolve. The 3DS file format is actually very badly documented in public sources, but now it works the way it should. Now that I have the absolute (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Good point. Thanks for the reminder. Jacob (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
Regarding the proposed file format document: (URL) is no mention of the scale used by the x/y/z triplets in the various linetypes. I would suggest there should be a paragraph introducing the concept of LDU, and how it relates to bricks and "real (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(...) And thanks for pointing it out to me, who didn't have a clue. :) Stefan G (20 years ago, 22-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
(...) hi kevin, it's because I'm allergic to manuals and I’m usually in trail’n’error mode ;-)) but seriously, the problem I had with the flexible axle (and some others who contacted me because of the MLCad/Lsynth tutorial) is the fact that the (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, Hah! RTFM! *The book* "LEGO Software Power Tools" makes it clear that LS00.DAT is the only constraint associated with hoses. Sorry, just in a good mood, because I just finished up rewriting the band synthesis code and made it much (...) (20 years ago, 22-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) On this point, the ONLY way for me to reach the widest amount of people possible is for people who read this message to spread to word. I made a conscious (and correct) decision not to massively cross post this thread to increase exposure. I (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) You are! Sproat agreed very promptly once Orion was able to reach him. (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Hi Jeremy! Yours was one of the names that I figured just wasn't getting through due to something silly like this. I also figured that you'd come through and approve the new agreement so that the parts you created could continue to be (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of BFC
|
|
(...) It looks like 1058 files are BFC-compliant, out of 2945 official part files. (...) It doesn't look like you'll be able to make that assumption. Steve (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(...) Well I'm now official embarassed. I knew that; really; honest. It's always fun when your users can tell you why your program is behaving in the way it is. Thanks, Orion, for pointing out what I of all people should have seen as obvious. (Just (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(...) In order for smoothing to work on parts outside the PARTS and P directories, you need to add the following to the header: 0 Unofficial Part This "turns on" smoothing in LDView. (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(...) I'm puzzled, too. Should I follow some convention regarding the order of primitives in the file? My optional lines *are* correct, I have verified that, but even a simple smooth cylinder converted with my program shows up faceted in LDView. (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
My converter has undergone a considerable update during the weekend. It is now called "max2dat", because it now handles the 3DS file format as well, and supports the two main export formats from 3dsmax. (The previous "max2dat" utility written in (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
(...) hi kevin, IMHO the main problem is that there is some confusion about the LS00.dat constrain an the rest like the flex-axle-end. my understanding now is that the ONLY constrain for all tubes is LS00.dat while the rest is used in the synthesis (...) (20 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation Precision
|
|
(...) I think 2 is sufficient, but 3 "feels" safer. Once there was an extreme case where 3 wasn't enough. I had to rotate train tracks and a train from a radius of... I think it was 750, 800, and 850 LDU. Using 3 decimals on the sin and cos values (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Status of BFC
|
|
(...) How far 'percent wise' is the standard library bfc? In about 2 months i'm starting work on a rendering engine for LD4DModeler 2. I was hoping to 'assume' all parts are BFC so I can implement simple lighting. (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation Precision
|
|
(...) I don't have a compelling argument for more or less but I think that if you can build the capability for more decimals then you probably should. In my experience if you think that users will get by with less, one will invariably come along (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
