To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 246
245  |  247
Subject: 
Re: duplicate primitives?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Mon, 6 May 2002 14:43:25 GMT
Viewed: 
3539 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Chris Dee wrote:
I think we should move to using the 4-4ringX nomenclature.

a) Copy RINGx.DAT (x=1,2,3,4,7) to 4-4RINGx and RING10.DAT to 4-4RIN10.DAT,
replacing with ~moved-to files.

I'm not *against* such a change, but I'm not a big supporter of it.

Maybe if we could revive the old primitives committee (you all know who
you are), or if there was another admin for the PT who could oversee
this project, that would be a good thing...

b) Make the PT reject new submissions that use the old names?

I'd rather not start hard-coding the PT with specific names and such.
OTOH, coding it to reject files which reference ~moved-to files is
probably a good thing. :)

c) Automated update of existing (and in review) part files to use new names. I
think these changes would need a cursory review, but not a full review. I think
we've done similar before when we added the neck mark to the minifig torsos.

The neck-mark was done with full review.  And there isn't really any
provision in the PT for a 'shortcut review process'.  Not to say it
couldn't be set up, but it's not built-in.

But a 'full review' for straight-forward changes is not necessarily as
in-depth as a 'full review' for more involved changes.

d) Delete the old files (does the install mechanism allow for this?).

No, the install mechanism doesn't support delete. :(

What we've done in the past is (a) replace the files with 0 DELETE ME
stubs (ie, the new files contained only a single line '0 DELETE ME') and
(b) provide a .BAT file (DOS script) that deletes the old files.

Steve - some judicious use of grep would identify those file containing
ring*.dat but not -4ring*.dat.

Yeah, there's about 190 such files in the official library.  Including
the open-center studs.  I don't think references to ring10 were included
in the grep.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: duplicate primitives?
 
(...) I think we should move to using the 4-4ringX nomenclature. a) Copy RINGx.DAT (x=1,2,3,4,7) to 4-4RINGx and RING10.DAT to 4-4RIN10.DAT, replacing with ~moved-to files. b) Make the PT reject new submissions that use the old names? c) Automated (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

28 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR