| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> > There are already too many files already.
> > Heck, we just released two 'new' primitives that are the same
> > as existing primitives, but with new-style names. :\
>
> ?????
>
> Just out of curiousity, what are these two?
Sorry, it was a false alarm. There are no duplicated primitives. AFAIK.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
| (...) That makes me feel better, becuase I was the one who submitted those two primitves. We should probably come to some sort of FORMAL decision as to wether to use the old ringX name or move them all into 4-4ringX primitives. (23 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
