|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Travis Cobbs writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Steve Bliss writes:
> > Here's a question: for a given amount of area, and a set number of polygons,
> > is it better (ie, faster to render) to have polygons that are all about the
> > same size? Or would it be better to have some large polygons, and some
> > small polygons? A few large, and a lot of small? Hmmm.
>
> I don't know about all situations (POV, etc), but for real-time rendering in
> OpenGL, the fastest rendering generally occurs with the fewest number of
> triangles (assuming that the triangles specify the same final geometry).
I understand that. But the question specified that the number of triangles
(actually polygons, but feel free to assume triangles) is fixed.
> The fact is that with most LDraw models, LDView is completely limited by
> geometry performance. This is why on a reasonbly fast 3D accelerator a mid
> to large size model will render at pretty much the same frame rate no matter
> what the resolution is.
So size of the polygons doesn't matter. Hmm. I'll have to remember that.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
| (...) Well, it can matter, but isn't likely to in a LDraw renderer. It would matter if the program ever became fill-rate limited, but that usually won't happen, except with very simple models. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
| (...) I don't know about all situations (POV, etc), but for real-time rendering in OpenGL, the fastest rendering generally occurs with the fewest number of triangles (assuming that the triangles specify the same final geometry). The fact is that (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|