To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 232
231  |  233
Subject: 
Re: ring 3 to 5
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Fri, 3 May 2002 18:17:05 GMT
Viewed: 
2910 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Travis Cobbs writes:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Steve Bliss writes:
Here's a question: for a given amount of area, and a set number of polygons,
is it better (ie, faster to render) to have polygons that are all about the
same size?  Or would it be better to have some large polygons, and some
small polygons?  A few large, and a lot of small?  Hmmm.

I don't know about all situations (POV, etc), but for real-time rendering in
OpenGL, the fastest rendering generally occurs with the fewest number of
triangles (assuming that the triangles specify the same final geometry).

I understand that.  But the question specified that the number of triangles
(actually polygons, but feel free to assume triangles) is fixed.

The fact is that with most LDraw models, LDView is completely limited by
geometry performance.  This is why on a reasonbly fast 3D accelerator a mid
to large size model will render at pretty much the same frame rate no matter
what the resolution is.

So size of the polygons doesn't matter.  Hmm.  I'll have to remember that.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: ring 3 to 5
 
(...) Well, it can matter, but isn't likely to in a LDraw renderer. It would matter if the program ever became fill-rate limited, but that usually won't happen, except with very simple models. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: ring 3 to 5
 
(...) I don't know about all situations (POV, etc), but for real-time rendering in OpenGL, the fastest rendering generally occurs with the fewest number of triangles (assuming that the triangles specify the same final geometry). The fact is that (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

28 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR