| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> This isn't necessary. Just use a ring3 and a ring-4, both with the same
> placement and orientation...
Wouldn't that result in twice as many polys that have to be rendered?
Forgive if that's a dumb question, I ain't much of an author, you know. :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
| (...) As a program author, I believe that yes this would result in twice the polygon count. While I aggree that programs should generally do everything they can to make authoring parts easier, I also think that Part Authors ought to keep in mind (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
| (...) I'm not a mech. eng. major, myself, so my knowledge of this CAD stuff is just from my math. skills. That said... As I understand it, a "primitive" is supposed to be an *atomic* unit, something boiled down to its essentials. A disc/circle (or (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
