Subject:
|
Re: New Lego Technic avi
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:25:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
647 times
|
| |
|
|
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se> writes:
> My experience with animated GIFs is that the higher resolution, the
> slower they go.
I'm not quite sure I understand what you mean by that. With animated
GIFs, you can set manually the delay between each frame. So you
control the speed yourself. Do you mean that large GIFs are slower
because they take more CPU to display?
> With my limited experience, I prefer to reduce colour depth to 256
> using nearest color, *no diffusion or dithering*.
I think it is important to not use dithering when reducing the number
of colours for an animation. The use of dithering will cause a lot of
extra noise in the animation, and it take up a lot of extra space.
BTW, it looks like you are typing fairly long lines and that they are
being line wrapped when you post. This makes your posts somewhat hard
to read. I think you would benefit from composing posts with lines
that are a bit shorter, preferable shorter than 72 characters.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Lego Technic avi
|
| (...) Well, you had to distrubute a free viewer (56 Kb) and a driver (27 Kb) and a 2 Kb document that reads "ANIMATE.EXE is a player for PC Animate Plus and 3D WorkShop animations. Although it is copyrighted by Bill Marsh, you may distribute it (...) (23 years ago, 3-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
