 | | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
|
(...) The thing is, right now they are LDraw.org. Do you prefer that we just refer to LDraw.org, without the names? I think it is important that LSC is under the LDraw.org umbrella. I invite you to start a new topic on moving from ad-hoc LDraw.org (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Who is Matthew Be?
|
|
Hello! I was browsing Brickshelf this morning and I landed on the folder of "Matthew Be" ((URL) like to communicate with him but I can't find his e-mail adress. :-( Does anybody here knows who is "Matthew Be" and/or could tell me how I can (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DModeler status
|
|
LD4DModeler is awesome! Keep up the good work. -Mike (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
|
(...) Agreed. (...) Yep. (...) Right. So are you trying to say something like; the individuals involved with the specific tasks are responsible/have the authority to make decisions regarding each technical task? That makes sense to me for the most (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
|
(...) absolutely! (...) I like this proposal a lot better, with one exception: (...) organization for LDraw, and then step down. Administrating the website, Parts Tracker and server are all separate technical functions, and do not fall under the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) Also, has anyone made the feet (#32475) and the "toes" (#32560) from Pohatu's feet (which are also used in Jengo Fett's Slave I)? (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) If any one is working on them, here's your chance to let it be known. I have 11 pcs of #32571 (Gali - blue), 5 pcs of #32566 (Onua - black), 7 pcs of #32505 (Tahu - red), 1 pc of #32505 (I forget the name - poisoned), 2 pcs of #32569 (Kopaka - (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) You can send me one as a test and I can see what I can do. But I don't know what the time frame would be for completion - we're mid-semester here and I don't have tons of time to work on LEGO. If the timing was better, I could've given the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
|
Everyone - This has been a very good discussion on the LSC proposal so far. I have drafted a new version, 0.7, which attempts to clear up the confusion and ambiguity, and also adds in many peoples' suggestions. I've changed the references regarding (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Lightbrick 2 x 4 (Old) [DAT]
|
|
Finaly I had some time to finish the old lightbrick 2 x 4 (from the 1950's!) Below I have included an mpd containing all subparts and new primitives (1 ring and 4 cones). The titles of the subparts are not the best, if anybody has suggestions, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Every time I've seen Qualification 2, I've thought it needed clarification. How about: "Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker and posted at least 5 reviews for each of at least 2 official updates." After all, just because someone only (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Part updates are currently every two months. 0303 (due to come out in about a week, I think?) will probably be a small update, since the Tracker hasn't been up for weeks. . . -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with creating parts
|
|
(...) Hi Jeroen: I think I'm missing something--are you asking for someone to render models or to create new parts? Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I agree that we have to avoid that risk you refer to, and I would suggest that be part of the LSC charter. As for the steering committee, I'm not sure the post from 2 years ago is really valid anymore, and would suggest the community start (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:27:28AM +0000, Wayne Gramlich wrote: [snip very good points] (...) Wayne, this is a great idea, and I would support this kind of process. Dan (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) it was semi-automatic - I used vimdiff to find all the differences, and marked them up manually. Didn't take long. But since it is manual, it's theoretically possible that I missed some - I promise, nothing was left out intentionally. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I guess I'm worried about the LSC defining a standard that has no meaning. Without the community accepting the standard, what's the point in having it defined? I do agree with later posts, especially wayne's - the vote is likely to become a (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with creating parts
|
|
(...) I know it's not a good idea, but it's for the trainposter and detail isn't priority there; the trains are about 200 pixels high. Again, I can send high-res scans of the BI and pictures of the parts. If you are really intrested in doing it I (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with creating parts
|
|
jeroen de haan <info@digitalbricks.nl> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HDtI4o.14K6@lugnet.com... (...) I can only speak for me, but making parts (no patterns) only from pictures isn't a good idea. Maybe that this is sufficient for mock-ups. Which (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) This is more what I was considering... a way for those who may or may not have been authoring Lego Parts to get a chance to be on the standards body. After all, its possible, but unlikely that another use for the program could overshadow the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
