Subject:
|
Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:07:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1367 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:43:19PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > Ad-hoc LDraw.org Organizing Committee
> > -------------------------------------
> > Jacob Sparre Andersen, Steve Bliss, Tim Courtney, Terry Keller, and
> > Community Advisor Larry Pieniazek. This group is responsible for forming a
> > charter organization for LDraw.org, administrating the website, Parts
> > Tracker, and server. (see: http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=1183)
>
> I believe this group should be responsible for forming the charter
> organization for LDraw, and then step down.
Agreed.
> Administrating the website,
> Parts Tracker and server are all separate technical functions, and do
> not fall under the charter of this committee.
Yep.
> For instance, only three
> of these five were involved in the discussion to move the site to the new
> server.
Right. So are you trying to say something like; the individuals involved
with the specific tasks are responsible/have the authority to make decisions
regarding each technical task? That makes sense to me for the most part.
> I will support this proposal with this one objection.
Great! I'm about 99% comfortable with the objection, and understand your
reasons for it. I'm going to think on it a little and see if I have any
additional thoughts here. Since we mostly agree, there shouldn't be any
serious concerns.
I agree that there is a natural separation between individual technical
tasks and chartering an organization. I'm fine with how the technical tasks
are being handled right now.
Thanks for your participation in this discussion, it added a valuable
perspective to the proposal. :-)
-Tim
PS - I've got a couple nits on 0.7 as it stands, I'll clean it up and repost
it as 0.99 if others are OK with that. I can post what the nits are before
reposting the whole doc, but I won't get to that right away - maybe later
tonight, maybe tomorrow.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) currently, since there is no formal organization (and we're starting to push for one, woo!), there really isn't an authority issue. There's only the ability. If Steve decides he's turning off the parts tracker, he can. If you (Tim) decide to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) absolutely! (...) I like this proposal a lot better, with one exception: (...) organization for LDraw, and then step down. Administrating the website, Parts Tracker and server are all separate technical functions, and do not fall under the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
