Subject:
|
Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:06:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1091 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:43:19PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > The LSC moving forward will serve as a catalyst for other LDraw.org
> > organizational efforts by requiring a voting mechanism be set up. This is a
> > good thing.
>
> absolutely!
>
> > Enjoy, and please discuss!
>
> I like this proposal a lot better, with one exception:
>
> > Glossary
> > ========
> >
> > Ad-hoc LDraw.org Organizing Committee
> > -------------------------------------
> > Jacob Sparre Andersen, Steve Bliss, Tim Courtney, Terry Keller, and
> > Community Advisor Larry Pieniazek. This group is responsible for forming a
> > charter organization for LDraw.org, administrating the website, Parts
> > Tracker, and server. (see: http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=1183)
>
> I believe this group should be responsible for forming the charter
> organization for LDraw, and then step down. Administrating the website,
> Parts Tracker and server are all separate technical functions, and do
> not fall under the charter of this committee. For instance, only three
> of these five were involved in the discussion to move the site to the new
> server.
>
> I will support this proposal with this one objection.
The thing is, right now they are LDraw.org. Do you prefer that we just refer
to LDraw.org, without the names? I think it is important that LSC is under the
LDraw.org umbrella.
I invite you to start a new topic on moving from ad-hoc LDraw.org to formal
voted body of LDraw.org, if that is indeed your agenda.
I don't want LSC creation to be bogged down in the trappings of ad-hoc
ldraw.org vs. the future LDraw.org.
>
> Dan
Respectfully,
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) I agree. That's what I meant when I said the LSC is the first step twards an official LDraw.org body. The 4+1 are not really LDraw.org - they act in what they believe is it's best interest, but so do quite a few other people, who are just as (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) absolutely! (...) I like this proposal a lot better, with one exception: (...) organization for LDraw, and then step down. Administrating the website, Parts Tracker and server are all separate technical functions, and do not fall under the (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
