 | | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) Also, has anyone made the feet (#32475) and the "toes" (#32560) from Pohatu's feet (which are also used in Jengo Fett's Slave I)? (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) If any one is working on them, here's your chance to let it be known. I have 11 pcs of #32571 (Gali - blue), 5 pcs of #32566 (Onua - black), 7 pcs of #32505 (Tahu - red), 1 pc of #32505 (I forget the name - poisoned), 2 pcs of #32569 (Kopaka - (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) You can send me one as a test and I can see what I can do. But I don't know what the time frame would be for completion - we're mid-semester here and I don't have tons of time to work on LEGO. If the timing was better, I could've given the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
|
Everyone - This has been a very good discussion on the LSC proposal so far. I have drafted a new version, 0.7, which attempts to clear up the confusion and ambiguity, and also adds in many peoples' suggestions. I've changed the references regarding (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Lightbrick 2 x 4 (Old) [DAT]
|
|
Finaly I had some time to finish the old lightbrick 2 x 4 (from the 1950's!) Below I have included an mpd containing all subparts and new primitives (1 ring and 4 cones). The titles of the subparts are not the best, if anybody has suggestions, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Every time I've seen Qualification 2, I've thought it needed clarification. How about: "Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker and posted at least 5 reviews for each of at least 2 official updates." After all, just because someone only (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Part updates are currently every two months. 0303 (due to come out in about a week, I think?) will probably be a small update, since the Tracker hasn't been up for weeks. . . -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with creating parts
|
|
(...) Hi Jeroen: I think I'm missing something--are you asking for someone to render models or to create new parts? Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I agree that we have to avoid that risk you refer to, and I would suggest that be part of the LSC charter. As for the steering committee, I'm not sure the post from 2 years ago is really valid anymore, and would suggest the community start (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:27:28AM +0000, Wayne Gramlich wrote: [snip very good points] (...) Wayne, this is a great idea, and I would support this kind of process. Dan (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) it was semi-automatic - I used vimdiff to find all the differences, and marked them up manually. Didn't take long. But since it is manual, it's theoretically possible that I missed some - I promise, nothing was left out intentionally. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I guess I'm worried about the LSC defining a standard that has no meaning. Without the community accepting the standard, what's the point in having it defined? I do agree with later posts, especially wayne's - the vote is likely to become a (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with creating parts
|
|
(...) I know it's not a good idea, but it's for the trainposter and detail isn't priority there; the trains are about 200 pixels high. Again, I can send high-res scans of the BI and pictures of the parts. If you are really intrested in doing it I (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with creating parts
|
|
jeroen de haan <info@digitalbricks.nl> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HDtI4o.14K6@lugnet.com... (...) I can only speak for me, but making parts (no patterns) only from pictures isn't a good idea. Maybe that this is sufficient for mock-ups. Which (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) This is more what I was considering... a way for those who may or may not have been authoring Lego Parts to get a chance to be on the standards body. After all, its possible, but unlikely that another use for the program could overshadow the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Yep, I agree 100%. Tomorrow I'm going to work on an 0.7 draft version of the proposal, taking in the useful comments made by all. It should tighten it up considerably from 0.6, eliminate the confusion, and add stuff like Wayne's recommendation (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I'm completely opposed to removing the voting power for the LSC. If the LSC can't set any standards why have it the first place. As the old saying goes, too many cooks spoil the broth. -Orion (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) How about this: Requirements for LSC Membership To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors become members of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following requirements: - Authored an LDraw part subsequently (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) They're available to whom ever wants to do the work coding them. They're all my extras from trying to collect all the variations of the original masks. I could even send a few of each so that one can be cut one way and another can be cut in (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
