 | | Re: LDraw.org 2002-06 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Hello Eduardo, What is it exacly that you can't find ? The explanation below assumes that you already have installed the LDraw Package, if this is not the case, go to (URL) page (URL) inside the table named "Download Link" there are 3 links: (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
|
|
(...) Hmmm... Lars will have to give conformation of this but I think L3P was handling your part as a submodel. That would explain why the tile subpart was shrunk when it was in any other directory but the parts directory -Orion (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | LDRAW Viewer 0.4 problem
|
|
I think I did something else that you never anticipated :) select part select ³Change Part Name...² look up part number elsewhere accidentally click in LDRAW Viewer window off of brick when returning to LDRAW Viewer (deselect brick) enter part (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | brickdraw3d comments
|
|
Hi, I just had a chance to give BrickDraw3D 0.6 (Carbon) a quick look and here is what I noticed while running on a PB G3 400 640 MB RAM 8 MB VRAM on a 128 bit ATi Mobility graphics card. OS 10.2.3. BrickDraw3D 0.6 observations Rotation speed (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
|
|
In my problem description I didn't mention that I had actually included the part in an mlcad model, so effectively it was created as a Type 1 line. The solution to the problem though seems to have been removing the part from the ldraw models (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
|
|
I appear to have answered my own question, though I don't understand the answer :) It seems that if the part is located in the LDRAW\MODELS directory, the extended face problem exists. If the part is moved into LDRAW\PARTS, however, the problem (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT [DAT]
|
|
(...) I assume you converted this code: 0 Tile 1 x 2 test 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3069bs01.dat 4 16 20 0 10 -20 0 10 -20 0 -10 20 0 -10 The explaination is that L3P shrinks all the parts/subparts (i.e. Type 1 lines) slightly for the seam (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT
|
|
(...) Do you have the seam option turned on? This option causes the parts to be scaled a little smaller to generate the seams between parts. For rendering single parts, turn the seam option off. Niels (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT [DAT]
|
|
While trying to create the 1x2 tile with keyboard pattern piece, I ran into a problem that I have broken down into a simple example: 0 Tile 1 x 2 test 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3069bs01.dat 4 16 20 0 10 -20 0 10 -20 0 -10 20 0 -10 Can someone (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Any part udate?
|
|
I'm sorry about that, I have an update with 200+ pieces in my computer at home that I couldn't upload because the server has been down this last week. I'll get the 2002-06 update and upload it all this weekend. Leonardo (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Library version 431 is out now!
|
|
For those of you who don't visit my webpages daily, the new version 431 of my Lego library for POV-Ray is available now! The link to my webpages is: (URL) Anton (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
Tore, I know exactly how you feel. I have only submitted a few parts in my time. None of which are good enough. A few had some duplicated line and stuff, which I corrected, resubmitted and were never updated. One was ignored by people and was (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
(...) A problem there is that, looking at the list, many of the parts are rare or ``vintage''. For example, I've been looking at this part recently (URL) a newer version appears in set 4164 (URL) part number 3888). I've been surprised at all the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Adding creator and file types to L3P output
|
|
Well, I got tired of opening files with BBEdit and setting the file type to text, so I hacked (and I really mean hacked) together a little Droplet (an AppleScript application that is drag and drop aware) to convert the creator and file types to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Any part udate?
|
|
It's a shame because i think that LeoCad used to outran MLMCad in Usability and design aspects... just that it is very hard to import new partlibs und lack of updates make LeoCAD vanish. :( "Damien Guichard" <damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr> schrieb im (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW Viewer and L3P
|
|
(...) Please try the latest L3P, see (URL) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Is There A Version of this part anywhere?
|
|
Found at the LDraw.org Parts Tracker: (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Is There A Version of this part anywhere?
|
|
Hi All, Is there a version of the 2 x 2 x 2/3 (x85?) silver reflector dish anywhere? Either an official or an unofficial version? I'm in the final stages of LDrawing my train, and I can't seem to find the piece anywhere. I searched lugnet and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Any part udate?
|
|
With release of the LDraw 2002-06 parts update, the LeoCad parts library seems outdated to the point I do not use LeoCad anymore. Damien (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x727 - Trailer 4 x 16 Ramp
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee writes: ( (URL) ) (...) I don't feel bad about improvements made to my old files. That's not my point. But I feel worse and worse about my parts submitted back in March 2002: <Long background> In (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
