| |
Wow, thanks for the kind response Linsay!
Actually, I was going to leave it open-frame.
Two problems with it:
1) Too ungainly, couldn't even hold it properly
2) Not too cool looking
3) How am I to do the back (I actually wanted to put a *huge* tail there)
Anyways, I hope someone learns from my mistakes. ;-)
Mladen Pejic, over and out!
http://www3.sympatico.ca/mladenpejic/
In lugnet.cad.ray, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.cad.ray, Mladen Pejic writes:
> > Thanks Geordan! The Carrier was meant to fail (actually I destroyed it in a • fit
> > of rage). ;-)
>
> I've got to agree with Geordan. I wish you'd kept at that
> carrier concept--the "traditional" carrier, while still cool,
> has been done a lot and a carrier that holds its "children"
> on its frame--I've called them "marsupial carriers", because
> mine had the fighters recessed a la Suffren [1]--is a very neat
> idea.
>
> Looking at the pictures, though, I can tell your fit of rage
> was well-founded. It looks GREAT but closing those very odd
> shapes would have been maddening! But, then, those odd shapes
> *are* something you do very well.
>
> Anyways, I'd love to see the concept carried further. All 25
> gallons of my grey are in use at the moment (ack), but with
> enough time I'll put together a marsupial for Suffren's snub
> fighters.
>
> best
>
> LFB
>
> [1] Maybe they should be "scorpion carriers," but scorpion =
> sting to most people, not = carrying children on its back.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
38 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
