Subject:
|
Re: Tinkering the 8880 suspension setup
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Dec 1998 17:27:12 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIEN@CTP.spamlessIWANTNOSPAM.COM
|
Viewed:
|
2921 times
|
| |
|
|
"Fredrik Glöckner" wrote:
>
> "Fred Carcanague III" <corkycarcanague@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > Fred... There are 4 yellow "A" arms in the 8437.
>
> Ah, but they're not the kind which can tilt in the end opposite to the
> ball joint, right? The ones on the 8437 are basically a 2x1 plate with
> an A-arm and a ball joint? I'm sorry to say that it's probably hard to
> make independent front suspension using those A-arms.
This may not be very compact, but mount them on a 2x2 plate with technic
pin holes underneath, and you'd get the up/down motion, no?
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Tinkering the 8880 suspension setup
|
| (...) Yes, this is very true. As you say, it will not be too rigid, but it will most probably work. The problem may be that you'll need even longer steering links, as the distance from the pivot points to the ball joints is farther. But the problem (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.build)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Tinkering the 8880 suspension setup
|
| (...) Ah, but they're not the kind which can tilt in the end opposite to the ball joint, right? The ones on the 8437 are basically a 2x1 plate with an A-arm and a ball joint? I'm sorry to say that it's probably hard to make independent front (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.build)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
