To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.adventurersOpen lugnet.adventurers in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Adventurers / 213
212  |  214
Subject: 
Re: Adventurers in 2000?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.adventurers
Date: 
Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:43:48 GMT
Viewed: 
4734 times
  
In lugnet.adventurers, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > I haven't seen this in years, but whoever suggested it was right on.  Sean
> Connery and Michael Caine have both said it was their own personal favorite
> (that was a number of years ago, so they may have new favorites).

I thought you had suggested it, it must have been Steve Bliss.
> 
> 
> > 
> > As for Adventurers 2000 I think we will probably see nothing new in the way • of
> > subthemes (just my gut feeling), but we will see new sets for the Amazon
> > theme.  I think based upon sales Lego will either do one more subtheme or
> > scrap the entire theme altogether.  Still you never know.  We could see more
> > Egyptian stuff, an Arctic subtheme, and a continuation for 8 years (a la
> > Pirates) but I doubt it. I have learned that for every thing in life I get
> > excited about I seem to be disappointed by three more.   If that holds true I
> > have already bought my last Adventurers set.  I am hoping for a continuation
> > though.


I guess I was wrong about this.


> > 
> > One other thing, do you think TLG would benefit by making their stocks
> > public?  Just a thought.

> 
> The only reason to go public would be for the cash infusion to expand their
> business or go into new areas.  Since they didn't need the money to launch
> their expensive theme parks, it would seem unlikely at this point unless they
> are contemplating something with huge start-up costs.
> 
> Either Adventurers will continue with a new theme or this will be it.  I think
> the Egyptian and Amazon themes have been covered adequately.  Atlantis/Lost
> World/Dinotopia/Pellucidar would probably be the best choice. • Indian/Southeast
> Asian would work.  Babylonian/Assyrian/Persian has potential.  Greek/Roman
> doesn't have the horror/danger element unless you work in the Atlantis angle.
> Arctic seems extremely bare and doesn't fit into the Indiana Jones flavor of
> the series - no treasure-raiding "archeology" involved.  If sales remain • strong
> for the theme, it may continue as long as Lego feels fresh themes can be • added.
> If sales are lagging, then it's done.  Even then, Lego may feel the theme has
> run its natural course.  Perhaps letting the theme sit fallow for a couple of
> years and then coming back to it would work better for sales in the long run
> (Forestmen/Dark Forest).
> 
> If the pirates theme returns this year or next (if at all), I think it would
> supplant the Adventurers line.  All we can really do is wait, because whatever
> decision Lego has made is already set.
> 
> Bruce

As always listening to you Bruce is like listening to the Gospels - everytime
I do I hear something useful and worth thinking about.  In the LEGO Bible you
are the messiah!

Mark L



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Adventurers in 2000?
 
(...) I haven't seen this in years, but whoever suggested it was right on. Sean Connery and Michael Caine have both said it was their own personal favorite (that was a number of years ago, so they may have new favorites). (...) The only reason to go (...) (27 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)

22 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR