| |
In lugnet.admin.finance, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.finance, Matthew Miller wrote:
| |
And perhaps which would be of higher-quality than CafePress? (“Anything
you want, as long as it involves faded colors on a low-quality white
shirt!”)
|
Yes, well I usually only print on premium-weight (6.1 OZ) 100% Cotton shirts
(unless otherwise directed).
I also differ from CafePress in that I actually screenprint, whereas
CafePress utilizes a heat-transferred process. All things being equal, I
much prefer screenprinting. A heat-transfer image, however, can be superior
to screenprinting when one wants a photographic image on a garment,
especially in rather low quantities...
JOHN
|
All of my LUGNET shirts from Cafepress have faded poorly. The entire heat
transfer area is brownish... looks bad on a white T.
-Rob.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
