To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 842
841  |  843
Subject: 
Re: T-Shirts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:53:18 GMT
Viewed: 
26 times
  
In lugnet.admin.finance, Matthew Miller wrote:

   And perhaps which would be of higher-quality than CafePress? (“Anything you want, as long as it involves faded colors on a low-quality white shirt!”)

Yes, well I usually only print on premium-weight (6.1 OZ) 100% Cotton shirts (unless otherwise directed).

I also differ from CafePress in that I actually screenprint, whereas CafePress utilizes a heat-transferred process. All things being equal, I much prefer screenprinting. A heat-transfer image, however, can be superior to screenprinting when one wants a photographic image on a garment, especially in rather low quantities...

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: T-Shirts
 
(...) All of my LUGNET shirts from Cafepress have faded poorly. The entire heat transfer area is brownish... looks bad on a white T. -Rob. (URL) (21 years ago, 25-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: T-Shirts
 
(...) And perhaps which would be of higher-quality than CafePress? ("Anything you want, as long as it involves faded colors on a low-quality white shirt!") (21 years ago, 25-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

23 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR