 | | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Probably to an extent. Still makes me curious though. I would be interested to see the "friends" distribution and "vote fequency" distribution across Lugnet members. I expect that many people vote for their friends and fellow LUG members' (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) the only effect it seems to have is to push something onto the top stories list. People highlight because they think a post deserves more attention. So once a story gets onto the top stories list, people stop highlighting it. If there was a (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Member Link
|
|
(...) Yes! I second this! (I posted this again just a day or so ago...) KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203 (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Member Link
|
|
Would it be possible to make the author name a clickable link if the author of a post is a LUGNET member? Accessing the member pages should be easier than it is now. (URL) -Duane> (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | community v members v registered users
|
|
(...) I'm not saying that all of the community should be allowed to vote. However, I'd like to point out that you are now assuming that only members have donated to LUGNET. I know that is quite wrong; I'm not, and I have. ;) Scott A (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Far worse than that-- "members who vote". Most members don't bother. The highest rated thread I've ever seen got all of, what? 20-something votes? Highest I can find on a cursory search is: 22 spotlights, 3 highlights: (URL) spotlights, 0 (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Yes. You need to put some skin in the game, somewhere. Sure, you could allow "registered" users to downlight, but personally, I'd leave it to members, people who care enough to put the smallest of donations in. Calum (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) You assume that the membership is representative of the community.(?) (...) You forget that this is the friendliest place on the internet! ;) (...) Hmm. Perhaps Kerry should be "eliminated forever". ;) Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Didn't it used to work like that? Tim (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) I just wanted to pick this out as a really interesting idea. Something like when I go to Amazon and it says "you've bought this, so maybe you'd like this related item", Lugnet could say, "you seem to post in .castle a lot, here's the latest (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Some old-timers may remember (URL) this thread>. --Todd (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) True but it seems that (although I admit I have little experience with collaborative filtering systems) revenge and retribution would be much easier to pull off. For example, I dislike someone so in revenge I get 20 of my friends to downcheck (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) That defies the purpose, Tim. That's still saying an admin, a person chosen for ambiguous reasons, should have power. Those reasons could be for being a loudmouth, for being the guy who happened to be there, the guy who other admins felt was (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) That's okay--say the community isn't enlightened about certain topics. If they unvote "important" topics, it can't be that "important" as a result. What that really says is, we're gonna institute a mechanized form of mob rule. If it's gonna be (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) That could be overcome by a mechanism where admins can block a message from being downchecked. -Tim (21 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Seems worthy of exploration. The downside is that an important but unpopular message might get downchecked pretty badly. (...) Interesting proposal. the threshold is somewhat reminiscent of the slashdot karma functionality, if you run at +5 (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) I would like to suggest a "down-light" option. Enough downlights could moderate a post into oblivion. Then you would truly have a representation of the "community" opinion on something. I've been thinking about such a system all week, just (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Oh wow, I didn't know that, and yes it does help. Thanks Janey "Red Brick" (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Yes, I just did a little test with this one (URL) was the first person to spotlight it when it came out. But he's got 13 others, is at the top of the list and so I think I can safely retract now... So I did. you can click on the details link (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) I think you should be able to just select the default "---" choice in the dropdown again, instead of "spotlight" or "highlight", and press submit and voila. Hope that helps. (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
