|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes: snip ... (...) Lets clear up what is allowed. I think posting that you have parts for a theme up for sale should not be allowed. Parts are whatever you make of them, most parts can be any theme you want, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| structure, tough, decisions (score: 4.849) |
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| There are entirely too many groups now. If you condense the .loc groups there are still too many groups. Condense the top level groups as much as possible (1), eleminate most of the subgroups. Combine some of the theme groups. I appreciate that the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| structure, tough, decisions (score: 4.849) |
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Sorry this is quite a bit more than a couple of days. I guess we all got a bit distracted by our other discussion... (...) I guess as long as a lugnet.org group remains I am not to worried about this. (...) That sounds like it might be a little bit (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| structure, tough, decisions (score: 4.841) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.591) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.591) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.591) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.590) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.590) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.590) |
|
| | Re: New Group Proposal - LUGNET.LEGO.QA
|
| (...) I agree with Lorbaat's observation that this looks more like Quality Assurance than Questions & Answers. However, given the ratio of questions to answers we typically find in lugnet.lego.direct, I think we can safely call it (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| hermit (score: 1.590) |
|
|
| hermit (score: 1.590) |
|
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
| (...) Not a bad idea... but this should go in lugnet.admin.nntp I believe... However, as a hierarchicalist, I'd suggest lugnet.build.design instead. FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| hermit (score: 1.589) |
|
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
| (...) Hmm - actually I think lugnet.build.theory might be a better name, in keeping with .market.theory The idea being to have a group that talks about the design ideas in an abstract way without being full of MOC announcements & praise (which is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| hermit (score: 1.589) |
|
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) I hear the sentiment but I have to come out and say this: You pay (to become a member) which gives you right to use LUGNET in whatever form or shape it is in, subject to your not violating the ToS, not for the right to influence that form or (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| decisions (score: 1.447) |
|
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) Difference in philosophy, then, I guess. I in no way intend to diminish the service Todd and Suz have done to the community - I appreciate their efforts greatly and a lot of people have benefitted. The fact that this site exists doesn't give (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| decisions (score: 1.446) |
|
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
| (...) Todd, You probably wanted to just let this blow over, but I bet you could have spun the change more aggressively and avoided the uproar. I read your note. I didn't like it. I waited. I think that after reading your stuff -- but only when (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| decisions (score: 1.446) |
|
| | Re: Broken mailers which mess up threading
|
| (...) I'd say that's perfectly in line with with RFC 850, Section 2.2.6. It clearly says that a References: headers is "required for all follow-up articles" and that the first four characters of the Subject: header should be changed to "Re: " if (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| tough (score: 1.385) |
|
| | Re: Broken mailers which mess up threading
|
| (...) I really don't think it's worth the time to work around it -- only to weed out non-compliant mailers in a consistent and reliable way. If someone is using a broken newsreader or mailer that doesn't put in the right headers, tough cookies for (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| tough (score: 1.385) |
|
|
| decisions (score: 1.231) |
|
|
| decisions (score: 1.230) |