Subject:
|
Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 02:02:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
446 times
|
| |
|
|
lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, William R. Ward writes:
> > > Allow discussion in lugnet.lego.* between AFOLs and TLC employees (both
> > > directions), but not among AFOLs. That is, if you tried to post a follow-up
> > > in lugnet.lego.*, your post might be rejected. If this is the case, you
> > > could always post elsewhere. Here's the rule table.
> >
> > If you do this, please create a newsgroup (lugnet.lego.direct.talk
> > perhaps) where such AFOL-AFOL messages are encouraged to be sent.
>
> Hmm, I'm not following you. For what purpose? I mean, how is that better
> than what we have already with regular discussion groups outside of the
> lego.direct area? The idea is to keep the noise levels down so that LD
> doesn't have so much to slog through that isn't directed at it.
Basically, the lego.direct group is for communication directly with
LD. But when a discussion thread springs from one of the messages
there, it would be good to have a "default" place for FUT. Perhaps if
you are planning on adding a filter to check the References and
Subject lines anyway, you could automatically redirect such followups
there.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward hermit@bayview.com http://www.bayview.com/~hermit/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."-Groucho Marx
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
