Subject:
|
Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:31:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
507 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Mohan Visvesvaran writes:
> Is there really enough traffic from the LEGO Direct end to justify this?
In some groups, the amount of traffic can matter more. But after reading how
Todd Lehman set up lugnet.lego.direct, it matters less. Consider the
lugnet.scala group: it has almost no traffic, but it serves to allow
discussion regarding a certain, largely unpopular, product.
> I've
> seen a lot of posts on this group go unanswered by LEGO Direct.They may not
> need to give a definite answer but at least acknowledge that they have seen
> the posts on say a weekly basis.Is it possible to give a breakdown of posts
> by LEGO Direct or Lego employees on an official level?
Sure, it's possible. And most of the time posts from Jake or Tomas cover
several subjects in an organized fashion. So in a sense, breakdowns are
provided. Yet I doubt that no one at TLC will be terminated from their job
because they don't communicate with Lugnet, unless of course if that's [part
of] someone's job.
> Just worried that
> after a few weeks of posting without replies people may take their
> comments,suggestions,issues to other newsgroups making lugnet.lego.direct
> redundent.
While that has a tendency frustrate folks, it doesn't necessarily mean that
Lugnetters will abandon the group. As far as TLC is concerned "not
answering" doesn't always mean "not reading". It could however indicate the
level of busy (or discouragement) that the usual answerers are experiencing.
> Just my 2 cents
Here's your 2 cents back! No charge for good questions :)
-Tom McD.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
