Subject:
|
Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 02:01:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
596 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes:
> The lugnet.lego.direct group is special in that it is a direct communication
> channel with LEGO (or, more specifically, the business subunit of LEGO known
> as LEGO Direct, located in New York City). It's intended for two-way
> discussions with LEGO rather than about LEGO, and as such it isn't intended
> for fan-to-fan chatter. (Not that there's anything wrong with chatter -- it
> just shouldn't be happening in the .lego.direct area. Lots of other places
> for that.)
>
> The following is a proposal to reduce the level of chatter in the
> lugnet.lego.* newsgroups:
<snip>
Is there really enough traffic from the LEGO Direct end to justify this?I've
seen a lot of posts on this group go unanswered by LEGO Direct.They may not
need to give a definite answer but at least acknowledge that they have seen
the posts on say a weekly basis.Is it possible to give a breakdown of posts
by LEGO Direct or Lego employees on an official level?Just worried that
after a few weeks of posting without replies people may take their
comments,suggestions,issues to other newsgroups making lugnet.lego.direct
redundent.
Just my 2 cents
Visu
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
