Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 21:41:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1288 times
|
| |
|
|
<snip>
> I'd especially love to see a _pair_ of groups -- .rant and .rave -- the
> former being for letting off steam and the latter being for posting • praise.
> And you wouldn't be allowed to post praise in .rant or to post a rant in
> rave :)
Go ahead you've got my vote on both.
<snip>
> Next, I wonder if there should be a lugnet.debate group (meaning for LEGO-
> related debates).
Perfect, I'd subscribe to it in a New York minute!
<snip>
There was a thread a couple months ago about possibly reorganizing the
> .market area. I really was serious about that and feel we need to attack
> this again. My current thoughts are along the lines of blowing away the
> two groups .market.auction and .market.buy-sell-trade, and creating in
> their place the three groups .market.forsale, .market.wanted, and
> .market.swap.
Actually I think that doing this would be great. Then I wouldn't have to
sift
through all the ones that's aren't "sell" "wanted" "swap" ect. in one big NG
like it is now.
--
Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| I'd like to kick off a discussion about the current state of the newsgroup structure here -- missing groups, unnecessary, groups, annoyingly or confusingly named groups, etc. The goal of this discussion is to come away with a list of practical (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.announce, lugnet.org, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate) !!
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
