LUGNET NNTP Server & Clients : Search Results: hermit structure tough decisions


Administrative / NNTP / Search Results: hermit structure tough decisions

Results 101 – 120 of 132.

Search took 0.06 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
OK, I'm posting before reading most of the other replies... (...) Thanks for getting us involved, like Alison said. <skip to the end> (...) lugnet.rant and lugnet.rave, yes. A good place to voice opinions that would potentially annoy other people, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.192)

		Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
(...) Thanks Todd for giving us the opputunity to have input into this. I think .Rant is a good idea but would want people to be able to include probelms with specific sellers/buyers in .Marketplace so that the whole Marketplace community are aware (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.192)

		Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
(...) I like the idea for all of these although I can see quite a bit of crossposting between .debate and the other 2. Maybe these groups should have restricted cross-posting? I.E. No cross posting at all or the only crossposting would be allowed if (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.192)

		Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
(...) I can't say I agree-- by saying that, you're absolutely forcing LUGNET into a position of choosing a religion by arguing that something that's unreligious is a religion in and of itself. Hence, you could argue that nothing ever was (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

decisions
(score: 0.573)

		False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP As these new groups now exist, I feel no need to continue the debate about them. I do want to point out the fallacy that Todd espouses here about being religious-neutral and religious beliefs (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)

decisions
(score: 0.573)

		Re: Serious group requests
(...) that, but she thinks its strange the number of heated arguements we have here. Granted, she is biased by the fact that she's married to someone fairly reactionary, so she see's a skewed version of things. However, even if I were a mostly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

tough
(score: 0.538)

		Re: lugnet.design
(...) Hmm - actually I think lugnet.build.theory might be a better name, in keeping with .market.theory The idea being to have a group that talks about the design ideas in an abstract way without being full of MOC announcements & praise (which is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.395)

		Re: lugnet.design
(...) Not a bad idea... but this should go in lugnet.admin.nntp I believe... However, as a hierarchicalist, I'd suggest lugnet.build.design instead. FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.395)

		Proposal: remove lugnet.dear-lego, or clarify its purpose
I know there is a distinction between the dear-lego and lego.direct groups, but that distinction is a fine one, and it's probably something that a lot of people are confused by. The dear-lego group would have made a lot of sense when TLC wasn't (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.394)

		Re: New Group Proposal - LUGNET.LEGO.QA
(...) I agree with Lorbaat's observation that this looks more like Quality Assurance than Questions & Answers. However, given the ratio of questions to answers we typically find in lugnet.lego.direct, I think we can safely call it (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.393)

		Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
(...) Some people posted that they were annoyed that they'd have to read lugnet.lego.direct in order to find announcements that had previously been in the train or legoland groups. I was trying to address those concerns. FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)

hermit
(score: 0.393)

		Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
(...) If this policy is to continue, let me make another suggestion to help with this: there's always lugnet.lego.announce - encourage LEGO employees to post there. Todd, I think it was probably a bad idea to institute this policy without discussing (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.393)

		Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
(...) How about this: allow them to post as long as it is crossposted to at least one lugnet.lego.* group. That allows the train or legoland type announcements to go there, and also appear in the lugnet.lego.direct. You could even automate it so (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)

hermit
(score: 0.393)

		Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
(...) Basically, the lego.direct group is for communication directly with LD. But when a discussion thread springs from one of the messages there, it would be good to have a "default" place for FUT. Perhaps if you are planning on adding a filter to (...) (24 years ago, 11-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.392)

		Re: FS-Pirate & Town Sets Mint In Sealed Boxes/Pack
(...) I don't think it's realistic to expect people to put OBO's in the .forsale.auction group. What OBO is supposed to mean is "I want $X but will sell it for less if nobody's willing to pay $X", not "I want $X but if you offer more than that, you (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.392)

		Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
(...) If you do this, please create a newsgroup (lugnet.lego.direct.talk perhaps) where such AFOL-AFOL messages are encouraged to be sent. --Bill. (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

hermit
(score: 0.392)

		Re: lugnet.sports
(...) At least using a web browser as an interface, if you read the .castle group you see the .castle.ninja posts as well. So if a theme had subgroups for the subthemes they would all still show up in the more general group. Any other MOC that fell (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)

structure
(score: 0.387)

		Re: A letter to Todd
(...) Todd, You probably wanted to just let this blow over, but I bet you could have spun the change more aggressively and avoided the uproar. I read your note. I didn't like it. I waited. I think that after reading your stuff -- but only when (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

decisions
(score: 0.358)

		Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
(...) I hear the sentiment but I have to come out and say this: You pay (to become a member) which gives you right to use LUGNET in whatever form or shape it is in, subject to your not violating the ToS, not for the right to influence that form or (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

decisions
(score: 0.358)

		Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
(...) Difference in philosophy, then, I guess. I in no way intend to diminish the service Todd and Suz have done to the community - I appreciate their efforts greatly and a lot of people have benefitted. The fact that this site exists doesn't give (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

decisions
(score: 0.358)

More: Next Page >>