Results 121 – 132 of 132.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Broken mailers which mess up threading
|
| (...) I really don't think it's worth the time to work around it -- only to weed out non-compliant mailers in a consistent and reliable way. If someone is using a broken newsreader or mailer that doesn't put in the right headers, tough cookies for (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|  
tough
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | Re: Broken mailers which mess up threading
|
| (...) I'd say that's perfectly in line with with RFC 850, Section 2.2.6. It clearly says that a References: headers is "required for all follow-up articles" and that the first four characters of the Subject: header should be changed to "Re: " if (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
tough
(score: 0.312)
|
|
| | REQ: Restructuring loc.de.* newsgroups
|
| Hello Todd! I am requesting a restructuring of the loc.de.* newsgroups. The loc.de.* newsgroups are almost not used because if the strange division into separate counties. The only message who has been written in these groups were initated by me (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
| (...) I have little experience with news group and common Internet rules and I've been reading LUGNET only using the web interface [1]. Maybe someone with more knowledge will disagree, but at least to me the whole group hierarchy carries also an (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) Sounds good, and when complete, will probably make the actual structure mostly irrelevant, which is good because a hierarchical tree can never properly represent the associations between different things, and the associations which are (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
| (...) Te only thing I said was clear that was people agreed with you. And the vast majority was a reference to the people who were in on the discussion. (...) Yes, that is exactly what I said, did I misquote you or twist your words? No, I did not do (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | A letter to Todd
|
| Todd, Let me start off by saying I respect all the work and effort you have put into creating this site, it truly is a great site, and I DO love your site! I have from the first time I came here, nothing will change that. And I know this is your (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| The only way things will look up is if you come to your senses and drop this idiotic idea. If I have to hit 2 or more groups to read ONE thread, I'm not going to come here anymore. And your wish for structure will force this. You just made (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) Wow, after a long day of reading and writing papers for school - that one made my head spin, lol - let me see if i understood it correctly: We can post there, but we can not repspond to another one of our posts? And, As long as there is a lego (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure
(score: 0.301)
| |
