To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 474
473  |  475
Subject: 
Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:20:25 GMT
Viewed: 
2609 times
  
I'm quite new to the Lugnet community so I'm not up on structure and
procedure, (I didn't know Lego were active participents) but this is
obviously a topic that has got a lot of people going. would a vote be
possible in a case like this where everyone has an opinion (feel free to
shoot me down if its not an option :) )

James Stacey
www.minifig.co.uk

"Lorbaat" <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> wrote in message
news:GAApqn.L5o@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Mark Papenfuss writes:
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Eric Kingsley writes:
Mark Papenfuss writes:

I think its great that LEGO is posting their stuff here,
But from the reaction, it looks like Eric among others do not want them
posting here and are offended by their presence here - but why?
Now your putting words in my mouth and I don't like it.  I never said I • was
"offended by LEGO's presence here" all I said was that a marketing post • was
not appropriate for a themed group.  I love the fact that LEGO posts to
LUGNET.
First, there is more than one Eric posting in this thread, and I said it
*looks* like that, never said it was law. No offence was ment - I used • the
name as an example, nothing more.

As the other Eric posting to this thread, I can say that I certainly don't • want
LEGO to go away, either!  I'm very glad they want to participate in • Lugnet, and
I'm very happy that they want to announce special deals and sales... but • I'm
also very happy that they have their own area to do it in, seperate and
distinct from the rest of Lugnet.

eric



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) First, welcome to LUGNET!!! We really are a friendly bunch most of the time :-). As for your question I think I would say it is highly unlikely a vote would happen. LUGNET is privately owned by Todd Lehman and Suzanne Rich which means what (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) As the other Eric posting to this thread, I can say that I certainly don't want LEGO to go away, either! I'm very glad they want to participate in Lugnet, and I'm very happy that they want to announce special deals and sales... but I'm also (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR