 | | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) Oh -- d'Oh -- well, OK, we could make lugnet.db into a group. Would you find that useful for discussing database things? (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) Todd may have meant lugnet.admin.database. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) The "database" group? Excuse my ignorance, but which group would that be? If I read my groupinfo correctly, the is no "parent" group to lugnet.db.* (no group lugnet.db): ht@katzenminze%pts/4 (20:43) ~ > telnet news.lugnet.com nntp Trying (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: a thought about brickbay update postings
|
|
(...) How true that is! You are so correct. In fact... I'm not using a newsreader at all. I use the web interface exclusively. (...) Check here: (URL) on reading it, does seem to imply that it doesn't work "everywhere" only on the top level group. I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: a thought about brickbay update postings
|
|
(...) The web interface does have group skip filters. The groups are not coalesced for NNTP. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: a thought about brickbay update postings
|
|
(...) Not everyone uses the same newsreader that you do. The filtering capabilities of various programs varies a lot, and the web interface has no such filters, AFAIK. Amy (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: a thought about brickbay update postings
|
|
(...) Since there *is no* top level market group (in the "newsgroup sense") but it is just a virtual group that is an agglomeration of the lower level groups in the market hierarchy... all you need to do is set your skip filter settings to skip (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Posting via mail
|
|
(...) It is possible to post via the mailing list version -- there's a two-way SMTP<=>NNTP gateway. However, this only works if you are subscribed for instant delivery (i.e., not digests). (...) Replies to digest messages are disabled by design (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Reply-To setting in mailing lists
|
|
(...) Chris, The quick answer is that the list software you're using is called "ezmlm" (URL). A more complete answer, however, is that you're actually on a pure- mailing-list half of a bidirectional mailing-list-to-newsgroup gateway. That is, some (...) (23 years ago, 15-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | REQ: Restructuring loc.de.* newsgroups
|
|
Hello Todd! I am requesting a restructuring of the loc.de.* newsgroups. The loc.de.* newsgroups are almost not used because if the strange division into separate counties. The only message who has been written in these groups were initated by me (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto/train1 issues etc
|
|
(...) FUT = Follow-Ups To - specify where you want replys posted by default (can be changed by the poster). Damn I wish I could always remember to add this when I set follow-ups.... FUT:lugnet.admin.nntp (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Problem with flags in Pine
|
|
Over the past few days, in at least two groups (.db.inv and .market.theory), I've noticed that when I leave messages undeleted, but read (that is, not flagged "new" by Pine) and then come back to the group later, they are flagged as "new". This (...) (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Why do you need to be polite about it? next time use proper swear words :-) Steve (23 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
How do I put this politely ... bionicle is NOT technic. Get it outta here. Ronan Ross Crawford <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:GAsMsG.9Mr@lugnet.com... (...) but (...) you, (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with newsreader IE5.5
|
|
Bryan's right; it was a user error on my part. I had right-clicked on each news group and selected 'Catch Up', which acted as if I had once downloaded and later deleted all postings. By right-clicking on the newsgroup, selecting 'Properties' and (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with newsreader IE5.5
|
|
I just tried it out, and clicking the toolbar button repeatedly downloads the next # headers. I download over 2000 (300 per click) before I stopped trying it. Bryan Beckwith FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp "Cary Clark" <cary@corp.nospamwebtv.net> wrote in (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Looks like we're in the minority, David. Oh well. 8?) ROSCO (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.robotics and lego-robotics@crynwr.com
|
|
(...) Hmm, I must just be imagining things *shrug*. (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.robotics and lego-robotics@crynwr.com
|
|
(...) SMTP. More info: (URL) Based on the nature of some threads, it seems that lugnet.robotics (...) Hmm, it's always possible that the link went down on the other side. Lemme do a quick sanity check on the outgoing subscription list for (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | lugnet.robotics and lego-robotics@crynwr.com
|
|
What is the exact protocol of message exchange between these two groups? Based on the nature of some threads, it seems that lugnet.robotics receives the messages from lego-robotics, but not vice-versa. This seems to have, on many occasions, resulted (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
