Subject:
|
Re: Posting via mail
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:13:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
410 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Hakan Tandogan writes:
> The "database" group? Excuse my ignorance, but which group
> would that be? If I read my groupinfo correctly, the is no "parent"
> group to lugnet.db.* (no group lugnet.db):
Oh -- d'Oh -- well, OK, we could make lugnet.db into a group. Would you
find that useful for discussing database things?
--
Todd S. Lehman | LUGNET Admin <todd@lugnet.com>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Posting via mail
|
| (...) That would probably be more intuitive than lugnet.admin.database (or is that supposed to serve a different purpose). (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | Re: Posting via mail
|
| (...) Yes, that would be fine, since we were discussing a more general "database" for Lego purposes and not the LUGNET database itself (for which there is lugnet.admin.database). I just hope that the discussion doesn't fizzle after only a couple of (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
| (...) The "database" group? Excuse my ignorance, but which group would that be? If I read my groupinfo correctly, the is no "parent" group to lugnet.db.* (no group lugnet.db): ht@katzenminze%pts/4 (20:43) ~ > telnet news.lugnet.com nntp Trying (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
