| |
How do I put this politely ... bionicle is NOT technic.
Get it outta here.
Ronan
Ross Crawford <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message
news:GAsMsG.9Mr@lugnet.com...
>
> David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message
> news:GAsMA6.8CH@lugnet.com...
> >
> > [2] I have to admit that I haven't read big parts of the Terms of Use, • but
> > still I have been reading LUGNET for a year now, enjoying it and even • posting
> > without making too many mistakes (at least that I'm aware of). That's • exactly
> > because the use is intuitive and simple.
>
> Keep on postin'!!! We'll let you know if you do anything "un-toward"!!
>
> As for the technic / bionicle thing, I'm pretty much in agreement with • you,
> and actually suggested at one stage creating a .technic.classic group, but
> after a bit of thought realised this probably wasn't the correct solution. • I
> think your idea (making bionicle etc totally separate groups rather than
> "chilrden" of technic) has some merit, and warrants further discussion.
>
> Anyone wanna comment?
>
> ROSCO
>
> [.technic re-instated]
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
| David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GAsMA6.8CH@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) exactly (...) Keep on postin'!!! We'll let you know if you do anything "un-toward"!! As for the technic / bionicle thing, I'm pretty much (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
