Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:21:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
603 times
|
| |
|
|
[Posted only to .admin.nntp]
David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message
news:GAs9IA.33w@lugnet.com...
>
> Are you saying that when I wanted some info on the LEGO stores in • Manhattan I
> should have posted to:
>
> lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny.man, lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny, lugnet.loc.us.ny, • lugnet.loc.us
> ?
You should choose the groups you think pertain most to the post. If you
think all new-yorkers may have useful information, then maybe
lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny & lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny.man. I think any wider would
probably be viewed by most as "undesirable" (certainly by me - but I
wouldn't have seen it anyway).
Note that in this case, as you pointed out, it's likely that some people who
only read .loc.us.ny using the web interface would have read the post, and
may have responded with information. This is just the luck of the draw,
though. You shouldn't rely on this feature - when I cross-post, I assume
everyone's using a news-reader.
> I'm not an expert on the posting rules... What will be the result of such • a
> post? Is this kind of distribution desirable?
In the end, it's up to everyone to decide - if the people reading the post
think it's in the wrong area, hopefully they'll send follow-ups somewhere
else, and let you know why. Start making too many rules, and people just
won't bother posting.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
| (...) I have little experience with news group and common Internet rules and I've been reading LUGNET only using the web interface [1]. Maybe someone with more knowledge will disagree, but at least to me the whole group hierarchy carries also an (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
