| |
In lugnet.technic, Ross Crawford writes:
>
> David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message
> news:GAsMA6.8CH@lugnet.com...
> >
> > [2] I have to admit that I haven't read big parts of the Terms of Use, but
> > still I have been reading LUGNET for a year now, enjoying it and even • posting
> > without making too many mistakes (at least that I'm aware of). That's • exactly
> > because the use is intuitive and simple.
>
> Keep on postin'!!! We'll let you know if you do anything "un-toward"!!
>
> As for the technic / bionicle thing, I'm pretty much in agreement with you,
> and actually suggested at one stage creating a .technic.classic group, but
> after a bit of thought realised this probably wasn't the correct solution. I
> think your idea (making bionicle etc totally separate groups rather than
> "chilrden" of technic) has some merit, and warrants further discussion.
>
> Anyone wanna comment?
Looks like we're in the minority, David. Oh well. 8?)
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
| David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GAsMA6.8CH@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) exactly (...) Keep on postin'!!! We'll let you know if you do anything "un-toward"!! As for the technic / bionicle thing, I'm pretty much (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.technic)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
