Subject:
|
Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:28:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
73 times
|
| |
|
|
On 6/10/26 5:53 PM, Todd Lehman wrote:
> I wonder that, too. According to the articles, headers, it was posted via NNTP
> over TCP/IP using an NNTP client called Forte, rather than generated via script
> on the server via internal article injection like the 1/2 articles were.
Oh, here's what must the problem: this message (of all messages, irony
of ironies) is missing its X-Real-Life-Name header. It must have
suffered an existential crisis and imploded.
:-D
--
N. W. Perry
a/k/a "Plastikean"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) You have a very keen eye! That is interesting and ironic indeed! The post says the feature "was recently added" (past tense), which means that lugnet.announce:37 should have had that header inserted. In fact, #36 and #38 (before and after) (...) (2 weeks ago, 11-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) I wonder that, too. According to the articles, headers, it was posted via NNTP over TCP/IP using an NNTP client called Forte, rather than generated via script on the server via internal article injection like the 1/2 articles were. There's (...) (2 weeks ago, 10-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
