 | | Re: Help with newsreader IE5.5
|
|
Also under Tools/Options/Read, you can set the number of headers to 1000. Unfortunately, the 'Get next headers' menu command or toolbar button doesn't allow getting anything past the first 1000 messages. If anyone knows a way around this, I'd sure (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with newsreader IE5.5
|
|
I am assuming that you mean you use Outlook Express with IE5.5, if so, hopefully this will help. If not, just ignore my post. :-) Under the Tools menu there is a 'Get next 300 headers' command which should help. There is also a 'get next headers' (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Help with newsreader IE5.5
|
|
We just upgraded to IE 5.5 and when we resubscribed to LUGNET we are not able to download the headers for older messages in some groups. We used to be able to see the messages for a year. Rose (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Delete dup post
|
|
Admin/Todd- I created a "dup" posting that I was wondering if you could delete: (URL) thanks -mark (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
(...) That set was (apparently) posted to Brickset!!! Yikes. Is there no institution safe? Huw - Huw more - Humour ... say, maybe not safe after all. I mean, it would be pretty Low to spoof us that way, don't you think? As far as new Amtrak sets? (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
To All, (...) I am not saying that these sets can'tbe legitimate, but I did see the Jurassic Park ones from the toy show, I am just very cautious on the eve of April Fools, especially after the train one last year, and the fact that the cons seem to (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
(...) Huh... Weren't there pictures posted to brickshelf a few months ago of these same dinos that were required to be taken down because they were in violation or something? Having had a chance to see them before they were removed, these look the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
(...) And this is the saddest part of all the April fools jokes. All of us who have been caught once or twice will reserve judgement on the announcement until well after April 1. (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6E42A60.F471%s...ink.com... (...) slowly (...) the (...) Well, you had me fooled - I even posted a "sorry to see you go" reply :| Glad to hear your it was just your body clock that was a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
"Rose Regner" <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:GAu85v.5Bz@lugnet.com... (...) stand (...) up (...) it (...) Ok. (...) Well, I can say with a clear conscience that I did not intend that message to be harsh, my attitude in posting it was not (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) If I jump into a flaming post, and someone jumps on me I am kind of expecting that not everyone is going to be kind. On the other hand if I am empathizing with someone or having a genuine Lego discussion with someone and I get flamed out of no (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) I just wanted to add my two cents-- a) I thought this was pretty funny. b) I agree with all those who point out that the problem is not with the initial joke, but with people jumping on each other in the aftermath c) I don't think that this (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
So, I suppose I should shelve my plans for a "Gun-weilding teen blames LEGOWars" announcement? -gyug (geeez, just kidding!) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
Stripped out .off-topic.fun because this isn't! (...) Obviously some have taken offense to my use of the word "Sucker" and I would like to explain that I don't find the word insulting. Last year when Ben did his April Fool's train post I got (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Since my name continues to reappear, I'll reiterate: I know this thread is long over, and it would probably be best to simply leave it alone, but something needs to be clarified. I don’t believe that anybody was really offended by the joke. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Being a week early made me think it was real. (...) I agree. (...) I agree again. Has foot in mouth reached the states already? Posting the message in the Top Stories was the main reason I thought it was for real. (I missed the downward (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) <snipped> (...) Amen, brutha! :) Dan (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) And I strongly feel that this media lends itself to people acting in a manner they normally wouldn't in a face-to-face, real life situation (flaming. etc). Since computers create a safe distance, people start acting like they can say anything. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Perhaps I could stand to lighten up, but perhaps I'm also genuinly concerned for our community, but maybe I shouldn't. Perhaps I should just let the community go where it wants. Maybe I shouldn't care about my fellow man. If you believe I am (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry
|
|
(...) I wasn't particularly offended by it, but it did bother me, for a couple of reasons. The first being "What the (heck) is this doing in my e-mail?"...like a lot of people, I subscribe to .announce by e-mail; unlike many of those, I read a lot (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
