To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9052
9051  |  9053
Subject: 
Re: Calling it Quits
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:39:31 GMT
Viewed: 
3240 times
  
Stripped out .off-topic.fun because this isn't!

>               Since my name continues to reappear, I'll reiterate:
> 
> I know this thread is long over, and it would probably be best to simply
> leave it alone, but something needs to be clarified. I don’t believe that
> anybody was really offended by the joke. However, it was the “additional
> comments” such as ‘suckers’ that was unfunny.

Obviously some have taken offense to my use of the word "Sucker" and I would
like to explain that I don't find the word insulting.  Last year when Ben did
his April Fool's train post I got "Sucked" in and thought it real.  That made
me a "sucker" and I laughed and said hmmm thats funny.

Yes I was a "sucker", someone could have told me so and I would have agreed.
So from My point of view I don't have a problem with the term "Sucker" in this
context.  Now obviously some were offended by it.  For those I am sorry, but
realize that when it was written and even now I do not find the word "Sucker"
offensive so it was not meant to be derogatory.



Eric



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Calling it Quits
 
(...) Since my name continues to reappear, I'll reiterate: I know this thread is long over, and it would probably be best to simply leave it alone, but something needs to be clarified. I don’t believe that anybody was really offended by the joke. (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

16 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR