| |
> > My statement there was never intended to be and in my view isn't considering Richard
> > less of a person. Though, I am puzzled as to why someone would be terribly insulted by Mark's joke.
> > Tim
Since my name continues to reappear, I'll reiterate:
I know this thread is long over, and it would probably be best to simply
leave it alone, but something needs to be clarified. I don’t believe that
anybody was really offended by the joke. However, it was the “additional
comments” such as ‘suckers’ that was unfunny.
(Clarification Table 1.1)
Joke = clever and humor.
Additional comments = unnecessary and insulting.
(The next time I call You a SUCKER!, I’ll say lighten up…o.k.! :))
> It's funny to you because you know Mark. It's not funny to someone else
> who is just starting to come out of their cocoon here, and showed
> genuine concern for someone giving it up, and then getting slammed for
> it.
> Frank
> > I can kinda see that. But, I just thought of it, and if I didn't know Mark, or
> > if it was someone I didn't know playing the joke, I wouldn't be insulted. It
> > might not be as rip-roarin' funny as it is to me because I know him, but I
> > wouldn't take it personally.
> > TIM
I don’t take it personally; again see Table (1.1) for further clarification!
The godfather of soul wrote:
> The second is that April Fool's jokes that aren't on April Fool's bug the
> crap out of me. Time & place, folks. There's a certain amount of leeway
> granted on April 1, but it's not a week-long event. You'd be pretty cheezed
> if someone egged your house because you didn't have any candy for them on
> October 27th, neh?
> James
I think James raised a good point about timeing. And the part about egging
houses on October 27 is really funny!
And also:
> Perhaps I could stand to lighten up, but perhaps I'm also genuinly
> concerned for our community, but maybe I shouldn't. Perhaps I should
> just let the community go where it wants. Maybe I shouldn't care about
> my fellow man.
> Frank
I don’t think Frank should lighten up at all, you did nothing wrong. You
merely stated your concern for the fealings of others. And I, along with the
vast majority of others, sincerely appreciate your concern for the
community. I for one am happy you are here. ;)
In conclusion, I'd like to say that I was wrong to incite the Lugnet
community as becoming ‘harsher’… it’s the entire Internet that has greatly
become a less tolerant place. And this is one of the few havens of true
creative intellect thanks to individuals like Frank Filz.
Sincerely,
--==Richard==--
You can reach me @ SHROUD_OF_KUNG_FU@Hotmail.com
-Lego good, Canada great-®
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| Stripped out .off-topic.fun because this isn't! (...) Obviously some have taken offense to my use of the word "Sucker" and I would like to explain that I don't find the word insulting. Last year when Ben did his April Fool's train post I got (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) Perhaps I could stand to lighten up, but perhaps I'm also genuinly concerned for our community, but maybe I shouldn't. Perhaps I should just let the community go where it wants. Maybe I shouldn't care about my fellow man. If you believe I am (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
