 | | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) I would prefer this. Or even as a separate news group that I can subscribe to by e-mail to my office address. They frown very much on large amounts of non business mail, but once a week should be OK. Gary GaryLouie@EarthLink.Net (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) I do endeavor to read .announce, and probably should subscribe to it, though nothing catches my attention like "whole brand-new currently available sets at super prices!" IMO LSAHS would be worth it's own group, cuz ATM that's the only email (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) Tom, Here are the options: (This topic has been kicking around for a time :) 1) Mike crossposts to lugnet.announce and lugnet.market.shopping, with followups set to lugnet.market.shopping. (Maybe also crossposting to lugnet.general, but anyone (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) I prefer option #2 only because my work e-mail system does not support filters, and I have to restrict the bandwidth. (The system at work is a main frame that is home grown, and is rather primitive.) The choice <lugnet.announce.lsah> would be (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) I like #2 also. I don't have a lot of time, as I already spend too much of it here enjoyably mucking about, to do a lot of email. My computer's demand has almost doubled since we started getting software for my daughter. I did subscribe (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) Oh, and I do vote for lugnet.announce.lsahs as the full name. -Tom McD. (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <369d88ee.21601198@l...et.com>... (...) This is just the opinion of a guy who has ignored this thread until today. I am interested, but decided whatever was agreed upon, was good for me. It is just that "lsahs" is the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <369e6a6a.1859138@lu...et.com>... (...) ever (...) vast (...) Yes, I thought that there would be a good description of what the group was on that page and it is true that you can watch the group for a while, but this (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) A couple things to keep in mind: 1. Whatever the name, it'll appear as the second entry on this page: (URL) It'll be pretty obvious what the name means upon entering the group and reading a couple articles. (This is pretty true for most (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Yep they do. Garshk, how do we get around this? Who ever thought this would be so difficult? The group name criteria should contain: 1) Lego (so as to denote its officialness); 2) Shopping (or the clear idea of (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
(...) Very true, there's nothing inherent which precudes the use of a more descriptive name, if possible (all things considered). (...) Hrm. Just saying "shop-at-home" is likelye to be misleading for anyone who doesn't know what LEGO Shop At Home (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | test - references - 1
|
|
this is with MAXLENGTH=4096 in the 'references' field --Todd (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test - references - 2
|
|
and this is posted from Free Agent. --Todd (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test - references - 3
|
|
sfdsdfsfdsf sfd sdf (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
|
Todd Lehman writes: <CLIP> (...) <CLIP> (...) I vote for #2 ng name being lugnet.announce.lsahs IMHO BEN G. (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: test - references - 3 My test Francesco from Italy
|
|
This is only a test...... se qualcuno conosce l'Italiano sarebbe più facile capirsi ciao a tutti Francesco Todd Lehman ha scritto nel messaggio <369e9ce1.14780373@l...et.com>... (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
|
(...) Allrighty then, I count four people (Gary L, Ben G, Tom McD, and me) who are in favor of the name being lugnet.announce.lsahs and no one yet directly opposed to that specific name. Linc S listed some other possibilities (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
|
(...) Sounds good. (...) Well, since both involve posting to both groups, I'll go with either. :) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
|
(...) Okie dokie then, I'll throw the switch and make it go. You could re-post this week's specials there if you wanted to test it, once it's up. (...) OK. Now here's the pedantic/esoteric hidden-question: Which one of those two alternatives do you (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
|
(...) Hrmmm, I think it makes more sense to me to have the post originate in the .shopping group but get echoed to the .announce.lsahs group. The .announce.lsahs group, imo, is a matter of convenience for people who want to drop in (or have it drop (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
|
(...) "There it is then," as they say. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
