 | | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8pj4h5.nhe.....bu.edu... (...) to (...) Understood, its ok. (...) nicer (...) I'd agree with you wholeheartedly. I just think that this might be good for improved communication. But yes, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) I'm sorry; I didn't mean to give you a case in point. However, I do disagree with you. Rather than saying that we should be nicer to younger people, I think it'd be better for everyone to be more civil in general. People *do* have the ability (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Kevin Wilson" <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> wrote in message news:39997771.9E15C9...rve.com... (...) Unfortunately, I think you got lost in the 'Its really late and my brain is fried' void. ;) Sorry bout that! -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8piho1.f4u.....bu.edu... (...) has (...) You should make the attempt to understand what I'm saying, versus trying to pick an argument. I said _general_ - obviously meaning that we're not (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pull down menus
|
|
"Rick Kujawa" <spacerocks@iname.com> wrote in message news:FzCEw0.K70@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) menus? I (...) IMHO I don't think a pulldown/selection field is a good option. There are too many newsgroups to make a selection box more (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) Whatever happened to us poor 35-45 year olds? Kevin ---...--- Personal Lego Web page: (URL) Air Market: Limited edition kit (URL) Kits & Custom Lego models: (URL) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Pull down menus
|
|
Hi Todd, With the proliferation of newsgroups on Lugnet; as a means to simplify posting messages to the proper newsgroup(s), would it be possible to make both the Newsgroups and Followup-To fields on the message window be pull down menus? I can (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
Looks very nice! mark (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
(...) setup page on either www.lugnet.com or news.lugnet.com. Either location would be fine, imo. You could also put a posting setup icon where the traffic, new post, and sign-in icons are located... --Bram (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) Other than RTL, all the other newsgroups I read are work related, but they are all fine. LUGNET is the only one with agro I read. Although, I did used to be on a Ian Banks mailing list thing, and that was pretty bad. I often wonder if LUGNET (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Delete Message
|
|
Todd, Please delete message: (URL) how does one delete their own message? -John (URL) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) Compared to Usenet, it's a pretty friendly place, actually. I'm not saying that it couldn't be better, of course. (...) [above lines compressed into one] (...) Wait a sec -- in a recent huge flamefest, wasn't it widely held that age has (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
Hi Todd and Suzanne, I like the look and "feel" of the new homepage. It is very concise and professional looking. PS The "Terms of Use" link on the page before posting is broken. Rick (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
We are pleased to announce a new LUGNET homepage: (URL) hope that you find it refreshing and that new visitors will find it friendly and inviting. If you miss the old homepage, simply look for it at its new location: (URL) thanks to everyone who (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Delete message?
|
|
Ii apologize if I am doing the wrong thing by posting this here, but could this message be deleted? (URL) from me, and I decided to change the message a bit after I hit the submit button. I hit STOP, but it loaded anyways. Again, I apologize for (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Michael Perri" <zerog270@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzBK0r.462@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) read (...) they (...) please (...) tough (...) they (...) racial (...) about (...) what (...) I've noticed, and so has everyone else I've spoken with, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | defining proper content
|
|
I am very new to this part of lugnet but I have found a small problem that has received my attention. Anytime I know someone that has found a problem all that I will ask is give a possible solution with it. I wonder if this might be one of those (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) OK, that makes sense. It's only accessing one server there once the image is cached, and then it gives you a large image file. (...) That's totally bizarre too. Another redirection script on a completely different site, presumably doing (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) the first time it was this fast. Multiple times didn't improve the speed at all. (...) the delay. I didn't get a delay with mimg.cgi, (the first link) though. By the way, how did you get those long urls to not split across lines? -- David (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) I think it's specifically the multiple ":" characters. RFC 1738 mentions ":" as a reserved character -- that is, when it occurs in the scheme-specific part of a URL (URLs being <scheme>:<scheme-spe...fic-part>, of course) it should *only* be (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
