Subject:
|
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 May 2000 00:40:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
545 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Thomas P. Rafert writes:
> > Todd Lehman wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > If what's shown is a simply a screenshot of a webpage, then that may well
> > > fall under fair use provisions of U.S. and international copyright law, • but
> > > if what's shown is the LUGNET logo prominently and without noting that
> > > LUGNET and the LUGNET logo are trademarks of LUGNET and its owners, then
> > > TLC is going to have some very serious explaining to do.
> >
> > I'm sorry to say it's just the logo and the name LUGNET under it.
>
> Hi again Thomas, I have another question if you don't mind. I don't have
> an actual copy of this in front of me yet and the close-up scan is still a
> bit blurry on the details, but perhaps you could see on your original:
I have an original copy of the mag, and I guess I'm butting in.... It's a
cartoon of a computer screen. I think they scanned the logo, the resolution is
better than the rest of the screen which just has lines of text hinted at by
the use of straight lines...
No TM symbol is visible in my printing although if I strained really really
hard I could imagine that there is a slight greying of the light blue
background where one ought to be. I'd just be imagining though.
Too bad, it's a neat plug, but ultimately doesn't help build traffic since no
URL is given, and it dilutes the brand since no TM is present.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) No problem about butting in Lar, I had to go out for a bit and I know Todd's curiosity is up. I couldn't find any TM either in the whole mag. I agree it's a neat plug but they sure could of went about it a better way. Could it be someone there (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) Hi again Thomas, I have another question if you don't mind. I don't have an actual copy of this in front of me yet and the close-up scan is still a bit blurry on the details, but perhaps you could see on your original: Is the TM symbol clearly (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
