| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> Given that that group is our interface with LD, it makes us look like a bunch
> of people who have not time for each other's opinion. I still can not
> understand why a reader should feel so strongly about a post that they vote
> <20 on it, but yet are not prepared to leave a comment. Cowardly.
You can't be serious...(?) A post getting a rating <20 in that group simply
means that the person rating it didn't think it would be useful to Brad (90%
of the posts probably aren't useful at all to LEGO or to Brad -- but that's
not necessarily bad). Leaving a comment would just be more noise, anyway.
Unless Brad asks otherwise, I'll continue to mark me-too's and other chatter
very low, and I hope others continue to do so as well.
IMHO, the ratings are working quite well for that group at present.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Given that that group is our interface with LD, it makes us look like a bunch of people who have not time for each other's opinion. I still can not understand why a reader should feel so strongly about a post that they vote <20 on it, but yet (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
