To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6173
6172  |  6174
Subject: 
Re: the latest news
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 19 Apr 2000 12:55:11 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
1101 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:

It was not a serious suggestion - and it should not be read as such :-)

I figured as much :)


Whilst I agree with Todd, generally, on how the rating system is working in
that thread- I also acknowledge that there may be many who do feel
differently about lowly ranked posts.

I find curios the fact that Todd appears to be asking members to rate posts
for the benefit of BJ - and not for the LUGNET readership.

Yup - for that group only though. Rating posts in lugnet.lego.direct as how
useful they will be to LEGO Direct reaps the most benefit for the LUGNET
readership if that means that LD can focus on the best suggestions and thoughts
in that group.

Rating lugnet.lego.direct posts on how good an idea they are in general (eg
bring back pirates) does not give the most benefit to the LUGNET readership.

Richard



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: the latest news
 
(...) Right. And it's not really that it's all that special/different/anomalous, either... In any group, the ratings are suggestions to read, for readers of that particular group. Brad is definitely a reader of .lego.direct and, arguably, he is by (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
  Re: the latest news
 
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Richard Franks (<Ft9L7z.20u@lugnet.com>) wrote at 12:55:11 (...) And you have absolutely no way of telling what is useful. (...) Why not? Surely a lot of people saying Pirates are great is a very good indicator that a Pirate (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: the latest news
 
"Richard Franks" <spontificus@__nospa...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Ft9JqB.LEM@lugnet.com... (...) your (...) your (...) doesn't, (...) wouldn't (...) have (...) I did (...) exist (...) It was not a serious suggestion - and it should not be (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

21 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR